Skip to main content

Centralised vs. decentralised contact-tracing apps divide the world

by Futures Centre, May 26
2 minutes read

Many countries are using or developing contact-tracing apps to track the COVID 19 virus among their populations. These apps use Bluetooth to identify which phones a user’s phone has come into close contact with and then notifies those phones if the user reports symptoms or is diagnosed. Some apps collect additional data such as home address/area, GPS location or phone number.

A split has formed between countries choosing to adopt a ‘centralised’ versus a ‘decentralised’ approach to contact-tracing apps.

Tech giants Apple and Google, who run mobile phone operating systems iOS and Android, openly back a decentralised approach. They have developed their own platform for decentralised contact-tracing apps and Apple has declined to make their iOS system compatible with a centralised approach (resulting is reduced app functionality and drained phone batteries). As a result, Singapore, Colombia, Australia and Poland – who were planning for or already operating a centralised approach – have signalled that they will move to a decentralised one. 

Centralised and decentralised contact-tracing apps are not fully compatible with each other; making it difficult to trace the virus across borders if countries are using different approaches.

So what?

A key trade-off between approaches is whether to maximise data availability to health services or privacy protections to individuals (see signal of change – Data protection rules are being relaxed across the globe in response to the COVID-19 pandemic). Should it be up to individual governments or companies to make this choice – especially where cross-border cooperation is key?

What lessons can we learn from this challenge to help international monitoring and cooperation on other key cross-border issues, such as climate and biodiversity?

Does the role of tech giants in the centralised / decentralised debate indicate a move towards greater respect for data privacy – or more opportunities to hold governments to ransom?

Signal spotter: Joanie Koh

Photo by Macau Photo Agency on Unsplash



by Futures Centre Spotted 1994 signals

Have you spotted a signal of change?

Register to receive the latest from the Futures Centre.
Sign up

  • 0
  • Share

Related signals

Our use of cookies

We use necessary cookies to make our site work. We'd also like to set optional analytics cookies to help us improve it. We won't set optional cookies unless you enable them. Using this tool will set a cookie on your device to remember your preferences.

For more detailed information about the cookies we use, see our Cookies page.

Necessary cookies

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. You may disable these by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Analytics cookies

We'd like to set Google Analytics cookies to help us to improve our website by collecting and reporting information on how you use it. The cookies collect information in a way that does not directly identify anyone. For more information on how these cookies work, please see our 'Cookies page'.