Skip to main content

Facebook shares partial evidence of crimes against Rohingya

by Anna Simpson, Oct 1
2 minutes read

Facebook has recently shared partial information with the Independent Investigative Mechanism on Myanmar (IIMM) regarding content it removed in 2018 and withheld for over a year, after the UN body accused it of withholding evidence of serious hate crimes against the Rohingya. Facebook told Reuters it had removed 18 accounts and 52 pages associated with the Myanmar military to stop hate speech, but has not commented on the content.  

So what? 

The head of the IIMM said he is hopeful that this first share of information is a first step towards “a cooperative relationship that will allow us access to important relevant evidence of serious international crimes”. Tech giants have increasing control over flows of information relating to international and national security, putting the spotlight on the ethics of their policies and regulations. 

Governments and tech giants are also at loggerheads over how data should serve corporate interests. In India, a government body recommended setting up a regulator for anonymised information to be shared between companies, to spur the digital ecosystem and support business growth. However, tech giants Amazon, Facebook and Google are pushing back. The US India Business Council says this would undermine investments by companies to process and collect the information. 

Underlying all this tension is the question of rights and ownership over personal information. Do the rights lie with the companies who collect it, the individuals who produced it, or the governments and authorities who are ultimately accountable for the public good? Should individual data rights trump collective security, or vice versa? And how can these questions be addressed across jurisdictions?

Crucially, are digital literacy and understanding of the impacts of different public policy approaches sufficient for an informed debate?

Sources

Details

by Anna Simpson Spotted 10 signals

Anna leads Flux Compass, a Hong Kong-based innovation agency supporting business and civil society organisations to embrace change for a sustainable future. Recent engagements include a Green Deal visions toolkit for Young Friends of the Earth Europe, a design lab for the UNDP City Experiment Fund and a scenarios process for UNICEF’s Iraq office. Before setting up Flux Compass, Anna worked for Forum for the Future in London as the Editor of its sustainable solutions magazine Green Futures, and then moved to Singapore as Curator of the Futures Centre. Anna is also a certified life coach and the author of two books: The Innovation-Friendly Organization (2017) and The Brand Strategist’s Guide to Desire (2014). She loves being outdoors, writing and running - in any combination!

Have you spotted a signal of change?

Register to receive the latest from the Futures Centre.
Sign up

  • 0
  • 0
  • Share

Join discussion

Related signals

Our use of cookies

We use necessary cookies to make our site work. We'd also like to set optional analytics cookies to help us improve it. We won't set optional cookies unless you enable them. Using this tool will set a cookie on your device to remember your preferences.

For more detailed information about the cookies we use, see our Cookies page.

Necessary cookies

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. You may disable these by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Analytics cookies

We'd like to set Google Analytics cookies to help us to improve our website by collecting and reporting information on how you use it. The cookies collect information in a way that does not directly identify anyone. For more information on how these cookies work, please see our 'Cookies page'.

>