Error message

Deprecated function: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; mPDF has a deprecated constructor in include_once() (line 38 of /home/futures/webapps/futures_live/sites/all/modules/print/print_pdf/lib_handlers/print_pdf_mpdf/print_pdf_mpdf.module).

Britain still has an important choice to make

Sensemaking / Britain still has an important choice to make

Let’s channel our momentum for change into environmental action, says Ivana Gazibara, Head of Futures at Forum for the Future.

By Ivana Gazibara / 30 Jun 2016

Nevermind the short-run macroeconomics. Nevermind the worrying noises from the far-right across pretty much every corner of Europe. Nevermind even the fact that our exit from the EU will almost certainly leave us poorer over the long-term. I am both worried and sad about all of the above. But there has been enough noise and pontificating on the potential socioeconomic fallouts of Brexit without me adding yet another voice of doom and gloom. The thing that seems to be missing from the mainstream debate thus far is the question of what Brexit will mean for environmental sustainability. Hardly surprising: environmental issues were largely overlooked in the debates that raged in the run up to the referendum.

The trouble with Brexit in the context of most environmental issues is that they know no national boundaries. Over the years, the EU has given us some of the world’s most progressive environmental legislation, on everything from air quality to waste management. The UK has often taken a lead in shaping these laws. Now that we’ve decided to go do it alone, there is a question mark as to what extent we will maintain those standards, not to mention how we will keep up with emerging ones. Certainly there is an element of ‘peer pressure’ (and real pressure, in the form of audits) that the EU membership has brought to bear on environmental matters, which will no longer be there once we exit. 

Don’t get me wrong, many of our environmental responses as a country are enshrined in British law. What worries me is that the same leadership (and I use that word loosely) that got us out of the EU, is a leadership that is likely to bring out the more environmentally sceptical and backwards elements in national politics. This could lower our ambitions on crucial matters like climate change action. After all, the UK signed the Paris Climate Change Agreement but neither we nor most European countries have ratified it yet. One decision to watch in the coming months is what we end up doing with the Fifth Carbon Budget, which is ultimately our expression of commitment to the Climate Change Act. Will we or will we not adopt the Committee on Climate Change recommendation of a 57% reduction from 1990 to 2030? We most definitely should. 

Not only do environmental issues cross boundaries, they also tend to be incredibly complex problems that are tough to solve. Particularly unilaterally. Now that we have pretty much flipped the bird to the wider philosophical notion of working in close collaboration with other EU countries to resolve key challenges, what is the message we are sending about collaborative action at large? Not a great one on the surface of things… 

There is also the practical, and horrifyingly complex, task of sorting out the legalities of Britain’s extrication from the EU. In this context of legislative uncertainty – including on environmental laws - business leadership on sustainability will become even more important than in the past. And there’s the danger that the time and effort needed for extrication will take away from the resources needed for implementation of climate action and commitments. Business should act both as a stabilising force, but also as a standard-setter of high ambition and real action.   

In the storm of uncertainty, there is one thing that’s for sure: if ever there was a case for some compelling future visioning, across national borders, now is the time.

There is a future in which Britain turns inwards and where the myriad uncertainties resulting from leaving the EU result in a slow-down in - or even a reversal of - environmental improvements. Where the resulting macroeconomic slide leads to uncertainty and reluctance of investors to commit, including to green industries. In which higher poverty rates and lower living standards lead to the sorting out of other priorities first. Where new social movements, from the radical left to anti-immigration populism, focus the lens on issues like social inequality. Many environmental protection laws could come to be seen simply as ‘red tape’ to be rolled back post-Brexit. This may also, perhaps, be a future where we are talking about just England, rather than Great Britain, being outside the EU...

However, there is also another possible future. One in which Britain takes a front foot on tackling environmental challenges, flying the banner for both climate leadership and collaboration with other state and non-state actors, irrespective of a lack of formal membership in the EU. Where young people channel their anger and frustration about the referendum result into a much more active and activist approach to politics, and accelerate the UK’s transition to a low carbon, resource efficient and sustainable economy. This would be an economy that derives social and economic value from ‘green growth’. Where the UK’s relationship to the EU is modelled on, say, Norway’s: close ties, and broad alignment on many issues and values, without formal membership.     

I am choosing the second future. Although a lot will change as a result of the UK leaving the EU, our dependence on shared resources and our common vulnerability to climate change will not. 

Ivana Gazibara is Head of Futures at Forum for the Future.

Image: threefishsleeping / Flickr 

What might the implications of this be? What related articles have you seen?

great article. The stakes are high now and we have to find a way of using this crisis to galvanise action by progressives. Neoliberalism is unravelling and the new order that will replace it is still forming and can be influenced.  We urgently need to start creating a positive vision to aim for, to counter the fear and hate unleashed by the referendum campaign. It really does have to be about the 3 aspects of sustainability - social, environmental and economic - expressly linked together...

0 users have voted.

The challenge over the next two months will be creating a strong, united progressive Green/Left voice, to counter the loud but highly fragmented populist Right.   If we can create an effective coalition to create and promote a compelling progressive vision of Britain post-EU (or even in-EU), then we will have a chance of making it real. However, I'm unsure where the nucleus for that coalition sits right now - suggestions on a postcard - I'm itching to get cracking!


0 users have voted.

As Naomi Klein demonstrated in 'Shock Doctrine', mass disorientation following a disaster is also an opportunity for significant social and political change. Rather than letting narrow minds exploit it, we must join forces beyond national divides and across social inequalities, and think very hard about the sort of society we want to build. I am with Ivana in wanting it to be one that recognises how much we depend on each other and on common resources. We need to be very agile, very mindful of the shifts around us, and especially of those that seem far away. Because when we stand alone, we are more likely to fall - and when we keep our eyes wide open and share our visions, we're more likely to spot new paths forward. 

0 users have voted.

Good article. I also loved Jeanette Winterson's piece this weekend about the need for a united progressive left, that can create a hopeful narrative based around equality and reform. Inequality is the root to so many of the issues we face at the moment, not least why so many voted in protest. The environmental movement needs to get better at linking environmental protection and equality/justice. Just take London's air pollution - kids in lower income families more likely to live or go to school nearer polluted roads.


I hope that recent events help to stir up more activism among us younger people and that our greater awareness of global issues like climate change (as well as our ever bleaker looking economic future) can help to make the debate more immediate and urgent.


It's time to get personal!



0 users have voted.

Thanks for sharing Jeanette Winterson's piece Sarah, a powerful call for new ways of thinking and working together. Here is another writer saying we must assume responsibility for how the story ends: Gideon Rachman in the Financial Times - though perhaps verging on the wishful side of thinking! 

0 users have voted.
Please register or log in to comment.